hair discrimination statistics

WrittenbyDr. Edna Skopljak, M.D.
Last updated

Hair discrimination is a serious issue affecting people, especially those of color, across the globe. But just how prevalent is this issue? To provide insight and raise awareness, we've compiled a comprehensive list of hair discrimination statistics. From the classroom to the corporate boardroom, these figures underline the depth of prejudice against natural hairstyles and its impact on individuals and communities.

General Statistics:

  1. 54% of respondents feel people of color risk workplace discrimination due to their natural hairstyles. (4)
  2. Hair discrimination starts as early as 5 years old. (11)
  3. 93% of Black people in the UK reported hair discrimination. (14)
  4. 1 in 5 Black women in the UK felt the need to straighten their hair for employment.
  5. Black students are disproportionately suspended for hair and dress code offenses.
  6. Despite 90% of black girls feeling their hair is beautiful, 47% of their mothers have experienced discrimination.
  7. The CROWN Act exists to protect against hair discrimination in some U.S. states.
  8. Social media initiatives like #SupportThePuff and #BlackHairChallenge highlight hair discrimination.
  9. Cases of children penalized for natural hair brought hair discrimination into the light.
  10. Black women feel more anxious about their hair in professional situations than women of other races.
  11. Hair discrimination negatively impacts self-esteem, body perception, and well-being.
Why you can trust Scandinavian Biolabs?

As your leading source for hair health information over the past 4 years, we never compromise on accuracy. When it comes to your health, you deserve information you can truly rely on - and earning your trust is our top priority.

Here's how Scandinavian Biolabs ensures every piece of content meets the highest standards of accuracy and integrity:

  • Credentialed Experts: Our reviewers are actively practicing doctors and medical researchers
  • Stringent Reviews: Content undergoes rigorous editing by subject specialists and review by a practicing doctor.
  • Evidence-Based: We rely on well-established research from trusted scientific sources like peer-reviewed journals and health authorities.
  • Full Transparency: Our editorial standards, writer credentials, reviewer credentials, correction process, and funding are all publicly documented.
  • Independent Voice: While we do promote products, we operate in a vacuum to business operations. Our main goal is just an unwavering commitment to providing medically-sound guidance.

You can count on Scandinavian Biolabs to consistently deliver the trustworthy health information you deserve. Read our Editorial Standards.

TrichoAI Hair Loss Analysis
Our free, anonymous and dermatologist-developed AI analyzes your hair loss in 30 seconds, suggesting personalized solutions to combat thinning. Understanding your hair condition has never been easier.
Yes, I want to fix hair loss

Hair discrimination in the workplace statistics

  1. White women are more likely to view black hair as less attractive and unprofessional (13)
  2. Black women often experience anxiety related to their hair.
  3. 1 in 5 black women feel workplace pressure to style or straighten their hair.
  4. Black women face unfair judgment in the workplace due to their hair (C.R.O.W.N. Research Study).
  5. Hairstyles on Black women are deemed less 'work ready' than on White women.
  6. 80% of Black women adapt their natural hair to meet dress codes.
  7. Black women are 1.5 times more likely to be sent home due to their hair.
  8. New York constitutionally prohibits hair discrimination.
  9. 44.3% of women face hair appearance discrimination.
  10. 46.5% were told their haircuts are unprofessional.
  11. 52.3% of women feel the need to alter their hair at work.
  12. 64.6% of Black women wish for more representation in brand campaigns.
  13. 56.5% want companies to create more products for natural black hair.
  14. 66% of Black women alter their hair for job interviews to avoid discrimination.
  15. 25% of Black women believe they were rejected from a job due to their hair.
  16. 66% of Black women in the U.S. change their hair for interviews, with 41% straightening it.
  17. 54% of Black women feel straightening their hair is vital for successful interviews.
  18. 44% of Black women under 34 feel pressured to present straight hair in headshots.
  19. Black women with textured hair experience double the microaggressions compared to those with straight hair.
  20. Black women were 83% more likely to feel judged due to their appearance (2019 CROWN Workplace Research).

Other Relevant Statistics:

  1. 82.9% of young people had their hair touched without consent, and 58% faced awkward questions (World Afro Day Hair Equality Report 2019).
  2. The U.S. Army overturned its prohibition on natural hairstyles in 2017.
  3. California, New York, and New Jersey passed laws against hair discrimination in 2019. Similar laws are pending in 23 other states.

Conclusion

In summary, hair discrimination statistics reveal a widespread and deeply-rooted issue affecting various aspects of life, from education to employment. Tackling hair discrimination requires a comprehensive understanding of its prevalence and its effects.

The figures provided highlight the urgent need for broader education, inclusive policies, and legal protections. As we continue to push for a more equal and accepting world, these statistics serve as a sobering reminder of the path that still lies ahead in the fight against hair discrimination.

Reference

  1. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/how-we-rise/2021/02/23/penalizing-black-hair-in-the-name-of-academic-success-is-undeniably-racist-unfounded-and-against-the-law/
  2. https://www.hr-brew.com/stories/2023/05/31/employers-have-more-work-to-do-on-natural-hair-discrimination
  3. https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2020/msu-research-exposes-discrimination-against-black-women-with-natural-hair
  4. https://hbr.org/2023/05/how-hair-discrimination-affects-black-women-at-work
  5. https://gunnercooke.com/hair-discrimination-in-the-workplace-the-importance-of-diversity-and-acceptance/
  6. https://www.law.com/international-edition/2021/10/28/black-hair-is-never-just-hair-a-closer-look-at-afro-discrimination-in-the-workplace/?slreturn=20230502180216
  7. https://equaliteach.co.uk/hair-equality-in-uk-schools-why-hair-is-more-than-just-hair/
  8. https://www.fairplaytalks.com/2023/02/24/rife-hair-bias-and-discrimination-against-black-women-continues-at-work-reveals-study/
  9. https://cosmeticsbusiness.com/news/article_page/Black_womens_hair_25x_more_likely_to_be_seen_as_unprofessional_study_finds/206898
  10. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/25-black-women-say-denied-job-interviews-hair-survey-says-rcna76006
  11. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-all-things-hair-survey-reveals-staggering-level-of-hair-related-workplace-discrimination-301160693.html
  12. https://www.allthingshair.com/en-us/hairstyles-haircuts/hair-statistics/
  13. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/nps/1900-v1-n1-nps05980/1076652ar.pdf
  14. https://pgnewsroom.co.uk/news-releases/news-details/2021/Gold-Series-from-Pantene-teams-up-with-Black-Minds-Matter-and-Project-Embrace-in-campaign-to-end-discrimination-against-Afro-hair-in-the-UK/default.aspx
Dr. Edna Skopljak, M.D.

About the Writer

Edna Skopljak, MDUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine

Edna Skopljak, MD is a clinical doctor at the University Medical Center Ljubljana and a PhD candidate in Biomedicine at the University of Ljubljana. She combines clinical work with research and medical editing, bringing a clear, evidence-based lens to patient education. Previously, she held roles in the pharmaceutical sector (product management and chief medical officer) and served as a medical production editor for the journal Biomolecules and Biomedicine.

Dr. Skopljak’s publications span clinical topics, including urology and orthopedics. She has co-authored work affiliated with the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at University Medical Centre Ljubljana. She trained in medicine with early clinical experience in Slovenia, reflecting a long-standing focus on practical, patient-facing care.

She strictly follows our Editorial Standards: All medical statements are grounded in authoritative guidelines, FDA labels, and peer-reviewed studies, with clear distinction between approved treatments and adjunctive options.